<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>religious freedom &#8211; Indigenous Values Initiative</title>
	<atom:link href="https://indigenousvalues.org/tag/religious-freedom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://indigenousvalues.org</link>
	<description>NYA WE&#209;HA SK&#196; NO&#209;H: Thank you for being well</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">130267695</site>	<item>
		<title>Native American Religious Freedom after Trump</title>
		<link>https://indigenousvalues.org/native-american-religious-freedom-after-trump/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dana Lloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 03:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctrine of discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://indigenousvalues.org/?p=10834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8230;maybe the problem with religious freedom is simply that it conceals deeper political controversies—about reproductive justice in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) or Indigenous sovereignty in Smith. Indeed, when the question of Indigenous sovereignty has been recently brought in front of the Supreme &#8230; <a class="kt-excerpt-readmore" href="https://indigenousvalues.org/native-american-religious-freedom-after-trump/" aria-label="Native American Religious Freedom after Trump">Read More</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;maybe the problem with religious freedom is simply that it conceals deeper political controversies—about reproductive justice in <i><a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5322529599500468186" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Burwell v. Hobby Lobby</a></i> (2014) or Indigenous sovereignty in <i>Smith</i>. Indeed, when the question of Indigenous sovereignty has been recently brought in front of the Supreme Court, in <i><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/mcgirt-v-oklahoma/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">McGirt v. Oklahoma</a></i> (2020), it was a Trump appointee—Neil Gorsuch—who wrote the celebrated court decision in what is <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3670425" target="_blank" rel="noopener">considered</a> to be “probably the most significant Indian law case in well over one hundred years.” Maybe the problem is not Trump’s court; maybe the problem has always been religious freedom.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/responses/native-american-religious-freedom-after-trump">Read more at the Berkley Center</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10834</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
